Nate sent me an interesting discussion on the interview with Naomi Klein on the
Shock Doctrine, used to try to impose a radical economic change. In this case, it was Milton Friedman who wanted to turn everything into a free market, such as school, health care, postal service, national park, museums, historical places, and more.
But it wasn't successful here.
So in 2003, when the US went into Iraq alone, it had the freedom to remake a country using the principles of free market system, which it wouldn't have been able to do in Afghanistan with France and Germany.
Donald Rumsfeld, a mentee of Friedman, privatized not only everything that Friedman believed should be privatized, but went one step further, privatizing the military.
Which is why Iraq trying to
limit Blackwater's role is so interesting. Why should there be a company where people are paid for profits to protect US convoys and troops? Is our government so defeatist that it must contract out its war, so dependent on using money because it doesn't have enough troops? And now Maliki is saying that the US should
hire a new company other than Blackwater to protect its soldiers.
What else would a private company, bent only on profit, do in a country where it is sworn to protect the US military?
Why else would Rumsfeld have entered a war where US military numbered fewer than could maintain the peace?
Why else would Rumsfeld dismiss France and Germany as part of the old Europe? And then after invading Iraq, refused them from trying to help keep the peace. It is because he doesn't the public system of France and Germany, that of a socialized health care system, to infect and ruin the implementation of a truly capitalist society, with a laissez-faire government.
What bitter anarchy, what a rebellion, how mighty proud the human heart that now resist these evil men!
Labels: culture, politics, war